Dear Friends and Well-wishers, greetings to all of you. Venkat has commented that while the erstwhile freedom fighters shed their blood, many enjoy the fruits today and that they must remember them. The catch is in the last part of the sentence. It does not serve them right to remember, since it will not help them to perpetuate either the family or the caste to seize power.
Now coming back to our hero Sri A. Rangaswami Iyengar, Kasthuri Ranga Iyengar, the proprietor of 'The Hindu', had no prior knowledge of journalism as he was an advocate (he was the father of K. Gopalan and K. Srinivasan printer-publisher and editor respectively) and so he sought his nephew's assistance. Our hero equally unaware of journalistic nuances, gave up his practice, took the job seriously, improved its financial health and made the paper popular by stating facts and confirmed news only, besides doing a masterly analysis of political and economic issues.
At this time, G. Subramaniya Iyer, who was the owner of the Tamil daily 'Swadesa Mithran', wanted to sell the paper as he was old and weak. Though a vernacular paper it had a nationalistic outlook and a patriotic fervour. Iyengar took over in Aug. 1915 and became its editor for several years. He published several books on state economics, politics, good governance etc.
His journalistic pursuits took him to national levels by attending meetings on 'Montague-Chelmsford Reforms', Rowlatt Act, non-cooperation campaign etc. A large-hearted man, his home which was a home for many freedom stalwarts, was always buzzling with activity. His munificence was already well known, but Subramanya Bharathi (fondly known as 'Bharatiyar'), a proud patriot, who would never extend his arms for charity, frequented Iyengar's house in Mowbray's Road (now T.T.K. Road), Alwarpet, Chennai and was very much fond of Iyengar and his views. Iyengar helped him join the editorial board of 'SwadesaMithran' and when Bharatiyar had to live in Pondicherry (a French settlement) to avoid arrest by the British, Iyengar sent him monthly Rs. 100/-, a princely sum in those days.
The loss of his elder son Srninivasan, frequent travels, mind-boggling editorials and social commitments all added to his ill-health and he breathed his last in Feb. 1934. He was also a great connoisseur of Carnatic music and the then Music Academy, which was a fledgling, due to lack of patronage, was revived by him and greatly contributed to the annual 'Sadas' - an event which is popular even today.
Coming back to our first paragraph, every society, nation or individual considers 'Gratitude' as a virtue. Thiruvalluvar, the great Tamil poet, says there is no salvation to anybody who is not grateful to those who do good to them. If that is so, what about our own nation which boasts of a long and hoary tradition and culture? The powers that be, the society or organisations need not necessarily assist their family with doles, but should they not be honoured? Should not invitations sent to them for National and Independence day functions?
We are awarding 'Padma Vibushan', 'Padma Bhushan' and 'Padma Sri' to actors, playback singers, sportsmen, politicians etc. who are all professionals who practised their profession only to earn for themselves and their kith and kin. I am sorry to say this but my voice tells me an ungrateful nation will perish more quickly due to its ingratitude than from a deluge that may take centuries to come.
With best wishes,
Partha Krish